| Home  | About ScienceAsia  | Publication charge  | Advertise with us  | Subscription for printed version  | Contact us  
Editorial Board
Journal Policy
Instructions for Authors
Online submission
Author Login
Reviewer Login
Volume 50 Number 1
Volume 49 Number 6
Volume 49 Number 5
Volume 49S Number 1
Volume 49 Number 4
Volume 49 Number 3
Earlier issues
Volume  Number 

previous article next article

Research articles

ScienceAsia 40 (2014): 11-15 |doi: 10.2306/scienceasia1513-1874.2014.40.011


The potential ecological impact of the exotic snail Pomaceaÿcanaliculata on the Thai native snail Pilaÿscutata


RatchaÿChaichanaa,b,*, ThepbodeeÿSumpana

 
ABSTRACT:     The aims of this study were to compare food consumption, growth rates, time to reach food, and food preferences of the golden apple snail (Pomacea canaliculata) and the Thai native snail (Pila scutata). The eggs of the two species collected from natural habitats were hatched in the laboratory. Snails of one month were raised together and separately to determine growth rates and food consumption. It was found that the growth rate of P.ÿcanaliculata was significantly faster than that of P.ÿscutata when both were raised together and when they were raised separately. Both snails grew better when raised separately. P.ÿcanaliculata consumed significantly more food than P.ÿscutata. When raised separately, P.ÿcanaliculata crawled to food at a significantly faster rate than P.ÿscutata. On average, P.ÿcanaliculata and P.ÿscutata took 8.2±3.2 and 15.1±3.1ÿmin, respectively, to reach the food offered. To test for food preferences, four local species of aquatic plants, namely Hydrilla verticillata, Nymphaea lotus, Salvinia cucullata, and Alternanthera triandra were provided to both snails. It was discovered that P.ÿcanaliculata consumed all the four different food species offered. In contrast, P.ÿscutata tended to feed on S.ÿcucullata rather than the other species. It is concluded that P.ÿcanaliculata was superior to P.ÿscutata in terms of growth rates, food consumption, and was also non-selective for food and therefore there is no doubt that in a shared habitat, P.ÿcanaliculata will influence P.ÿscutata.

Download PDF

52 Downloads 1298 Views


a DepartmentÿofÿEnvironmentalÿTechnologyÿandÿManagement, FacultyÿofÿEnvironment, KasetsartÿUniversity, Chatuchak, Bangkokÿ10900ÿThailand
b CentreÿforÿAdvancedÿStudiesÿinÿTropicalÿNaturalÿResources, NRU-KU, KasetsartÿUniversity, Chatuchak, Bangkokÿ10900ÿThailand

* Corresponding author, E-mail: fscircc@ku.ac.th

Received 10 Jul 2013, Accepted 22 Dec 2013