| Home  | About ScienceAsia  | Publication charge  | Advertise with us  | Subscription for printed version  | Contact us  
Editorial Board
Journal Policy
Instructions for Authors
Online submission
Author Login
Reviewer Login
Volume 50 Number 1
Volume 49 Number 6
Volume 49 Number 5
Volume 49S Number 1
Volume 49 Number 4
Volume 49 Number 3
Earlier issues
Back

Research Article

ScienceAsia 28 (2002) :011-016 |doi: 10.2306/scienceasia1513-1874.2002.28.011

 

Connective Tissue and Bacterial Deposits on Silicone Sheet and ePTFE Barrier Membranes in Guided Periodontal Tissue Regeneration


Wandee Apinhasmita,*, Somporn Swasdisonb, Suphot Tamsailomc and Nophadol Suppipatc


ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to compare connective tissue and bacterial deposits on silicone sheets (SS) and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membranes (ePTFE) used as barrier membranes in guided tissue regeneration (GTR) for periodontal treatment. Eighteen intrabony periodontal lesions from 18 patients were first surgically treated by GTR and either SS or ePTFE were used as barrier membranes. Four to six weeks after the first operation, membranes were retrieved from surgical sites and processed for the scanning electron microscopy. Quantitative study of deposits on the lesion-facing surfaces of membranes was performed. The differences between the number of fields of connective tissue and bacteria on SS and ePTFE were analyzed by the Chi-square test at the level of 0.05 significance. The result showed no significant difference between the number of fields of connective tissue on the surfaces of SS and ePTFE (p=0.875). However, the number of fields of bacteria found on SS were significantly less than those found on ePTFE (p<0.001). The comparable number of fields of connective tissue deposits on both types of membranes suggests that the degree of healing under both types of membranes was also comparable. Therefore, SS can be used as a barrier membrane in GTR for periodontal treatment.

Download PDF


a Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
b Department of Oral Pathology, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
c Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.

* Corresponding author, E-mail: awandee@chula.ac.th

Received 8 Jun 2001, Accepted 19 Sep 2001