| Home  | About ScienceAsia  | Publication charge  | Advertise with us  | Subscription for printed version  | Contact us  
Editorial Board
Journal Policy
Instructions for Authors
Online submission
Author Login
Reviewer Login
Volume 50 Number 3
Volume 50 Number 2
Volume 50 Number 1
Volume 49 Number 6
Volume 49 Number 5
Volume 49S Number 1
Earlier issues
Volume 49 Number 3


Research articles

ScienceAsia 50 (2024):ID 2024069 1-9 |doi: 10.2306/scienceasia1513-1874.2024.069


Alteration of antimicrobial phenotypic resistance of E. coli in municipal wastewater treatment process and receiving canal water in Bangkok, Thailand


Wilai Chiemchaisria,*, Chart Chiemchaisria, Nopparat Patchaneeb, Toru Watanabec

 
ABSTRACT:     The phenotypic prevalence of antibiotic-resistant E. coli (ARE) in the sewage of Bangkok City, Thailand, during the conventional activated sludge (CAS) process was evaluated. The relationship of ARE in the CAS effluent/receiving water was investigated. The CAS E. coli isolates were tested against 20/21 antibiotics in 6 classes: 4 aminoglycosides, A; 3 tetracyclines, T; 1 chloramphenicol, C; 11 quinolones, Q; 1 sulfonamide, S; and 1 betalactam, B. The results showed that the sewage contained 84% ARE, of which 28% was single drug-resistance and 56% was multidrug-resistant E. coli (MRE). Poor removals of ARE/MRE were found in the CAS. Inversely, a more susceptive E. coli population to all tested antibiotics was detected in the CAS effluent (24%). When MRE was classified into low (L)-, medium (M)-, and high (H)-levels based on number of resistant antibiotics, it showed that the effluent L-MRE (2 to 5 antibiotics) was highest (46%) compared to the others (29?38%), while H-MRE (11 to 16 antibiotics) was relatively dominant in the dewatered sludge (24%). Additionally, Q-S-T was the most phenotypic resistant pattern in sludge, while Q-S was highly frequent in effluent. ARE in receiving water showed a high correlation to MRE of CAS effluent along receiving water due to high contamination of coliforms and E. coli.

Download PDF

1 Downloads 110 Views


a Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900 Thailand
b Fisheries Program, Faculty of Agriculture Technology, Sakon Nakhon Rajabhat University, Sakon Nakhon 47000 Thailand
c Department of Food, Life and Environmental Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Yamagata University, Yamagata 990-0021 Japan

* Corresponding author, E-mail: fengwlc@ku.ac.th

Received 12 Sep 2023, Accepted 9 May 2024