| Home  | About ScienceAsia  | Publication charge  | Advertise with us  | Subscription for printed version  | Contact us  
Editorial Board
Journal Policy
Instructions for Authors
Online submission
Author Login
Reviewer Login
Volume 50 Number 5
Volume 50 Number 4
Volume 50 Number 3
Volume 50 Number 2
Volume 50 Number 1
Volume 49 Number 6
Earlier issues
Volume  Number 

previous article next article

Short reports

ScienceAsia (): 169-171 |doi: 10.2306/scienceasia1513-1874...169


Comparison between ECL and ELISA for the detection of salivary cortisol and determination of the relationship between cortisol in saliva and serum measured by ECL


Somrudee Saiyudthonga,c,*, Pongwut Suwannaratb, Therdkiat Trongwongsab, Surangrat Srisurapanonb

 
ABSTRACT:     Salivary cortisol has been increasingly used as a stress biomarker since saliva sampling induces less additional stress than blood sampling. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) has been commonly used to measure salivary cortisol in stress related research. Recently, electrochemiluminescence (ECL), a routine immunoassay analyser, has been suggested to measure salivary cortisol. Therefore, the aims of this study are: (1) to compare salivary cortisol level measured by ELISA and ECL and (2) to determine the relationship between salivary cortisol and serum cortisol measured by ECL. Both salivary and serum samples were collected from 83 volunteers for cortisol measurement by ECL analysis. The salivary cortisol value was 3% of that of the serum cortisol. For ECL, the positive correlation between salivary and serum cortisol levels was significant (r=0.84; p<0.001). The measurement by two different methods did not show any significant difference (p=0.5497). The correlation of salivary cortisol values measured by both techniques was significant (r=0.81; p<0.001). The result suggests that ECL seems to be more practical and cheaper for salivary cortisol measurement.

Download PDF

29 Downloads 1358 Views


a Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Srinakharinwirot University, Bangkok
b Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Srinakharinwirot University, Bangkok
c Neuroscience Research Centre, Srinakharinwirot University, Bangkok

* Corresponding author, E-mail: somrudee@swu.ac.th

Received 16 Nov 2009, Accepted 23 Apr 2010